Spies Like Us: An in depth analysis of Eastern Europe

 

A Web Quest for 12th Grade (AP European History)

Designed by

Bethany Nottingham
browndog1530@yahoo.com

The Berlin Wall Comes Down: November 9, 1989

Menu

Introduction | Task | Resources | Process | Evaluation | Conclusion

 

 

Introduction

The year is 2009, the twentieth anniversary of the fall of communism. You have just landed a high-ranking position in the United States government. The president has asked you along with other officials to conduct an in depth analysis of the political, economic, military, and social developments of the former communist nations in eastern Europe in order to determine where assistance, supervision or intervention may be needed.

Return to Menu

Task

As either director of NATO, the Secretary of State, the Undersecretary of State for Europe, Chief of the NSA, the DCI, or the Chairperson of the JCS, you will work together to develop this report for the president. She feels that as the leading world power, it is our responsibility to promote democratic ideals throughout the world. Therefore you must maintain a watchful eye on these former communist nations to assure her that democracy prevails.

Return to Menu

Resources

Listed below are several websites that may be helpful in your task. You may also use any sites you find relevant to your search as well.

Sites containing historical background:

http://www.dailysoft.com/berlinwall/

http://www.andreas.com/berlin.html

http://www.historyguide.org/europe/lecture16.html

Governmental agency sites:

http://www.csis.org/ee/

http://www.epa.gov/oia/dark.htm

http://www.nsa.gov/about_nsa/index.html

http://www.state.gov/p/eur/

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/rls/dos/index.cfm?docid=436&clid=299

Sites containing documents:

http://www.nara.gov/exhall/originals/kennedy.html

http://www.aynrand.org/medialink/berlin.shtml

http://www.seerecon.org/KeyDocuments/KD1999062401.htm

http://www.rferl.org/nca/special/10years/

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/newsid_501000/501580.asp

http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/eu.htm

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/newsid_515000/515968.asp

http://library.thinkquest.org/10775/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/newsid_734000/734123.stm

http://www.franklincollege.edu/matweb/maharry/budapest/NPRreports.html

http://www.uga.edu/columns/990215/front2.html

Sites containing pictures:

http://www.dieberlinermauer.de/berlinwallhome/berlinwallhome.html

http://www.swlink.com/~ateo/

 

Other helpful links:

http://plato.acadiau.ca/COURSES/POLS/Grieve/3593/~3593.html

US Department of State "regional desk"

Press releases and policy statements on the "Newly Independent States"

Radio Free Europe (RFE/RL)

Searchable index of daily press briefs

RFE/RL Special Report 10 years after

Articles and interviews 10 yrs after fall of communism

RFE Weekly News Features

Page long articles on current events

Washington Post Balkans Report

.

Study on NATO enlargement

The "official" line on costs and benefits

OSCE

Organization for Security & Cooperation in Europe

Corruption:  Johnston Colgate U Biblio

Professional bibliography and index to web resources

Transparency International

Tackling corruption through info and institution building

Centre for the Study of Democracy

Bulgarian--promoting institution-building

Slavic Research Centre

Comprehensive multilayered site based in Japan

Eurasia Foundation

Democratic and free market institution building

Russian and East European Network Information Center

U of Texas premier site:  If you can't find it here, look harder!

Freedom House: Nations in Transit Reports

PDF files from a respected source: articles & country reports for EVERY country in the region

Crisis Web

Analysis of Bosnia & South Balkans

World Bank: Europe & Central Asia

Mission, news releases, data

EBRD

European Bank for Reconstruction & Development

Centre for Study of Public Policy

Summaries of hundreds of articles on public opinion & democratization (Richard Rose, Director)

International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

News and judgments

Russian & Eastern European Studies (REES)

A Pittsburg U guide

Amina

A page criticising Russian actions in Chechnya

gallupphoto

Interesting photo-journalism from Czech viewpoint

CentralEurope.com

Daily news focused on the region

Russia.com

Daily news on the faltering Russian state & economy

Eurasia Research Center

News and analysis

Baltic States Weblinks

.

Bosnia Home Page

CalTech University

Open Society Archives

Central European University  on communism & cold war

Return to Menu

Process

In order to successfully complete this WebQuest you will need to work as a group. It is up to you to decide what each member in the group will do. The group should consist of six members as stated above.

    1. Each member is responsible for researching their individual role and generating a written report outlining recommendations, which coincide with their position in their sphere of influence.
    2. Once individual reports are developed, the group will work together to create an overall analysis to be presented in written and oral form.
    3. The oral presentation may include PowerPoint; video, charts, graphs or any other means you deem appropriate.

Return to Menu

 

Evaluation

The following rubrics will be used to determine your final grade for this project. Please note that you will receive both an individual as well as a group grade for this WebQuest.

Rubric for Individual report

Grading Category

Beginning

0-6

Developing

7-12

Accomplished

13-17

Exemplary

18-20

Score

Product: Individual Research

Little or no research was conducted

Research skills need to be developed more

Research was complete and accurate. All major aspects of the subject addressed

Research on the subject is comprehensive and extensive

 

Product:

Assessment of web sites

Little or no assessment was done

Needs to better organize and differentiate importance of web sites

Assessment is appropriate and information obtained is relevant to subject

Assessment is organized, detailed and innovative in relation to the subject

 

Product: Historical Accuracy

Little or no attempt is made at determining historical accuracy

Needs to check for errors in accuracy

Information is accurate and complete. All major aspects of the subject addressed

Information is accurate and precise. Subject is explained in detail

 

Product: Mechanics

No product produced or too many errors

Writing was confusing or difficult to read. Text contained many errors in grammar and/or spelling.

Writing was clear and interesting with a moderate amount of errors.

Writing was easily understandable and exciting to read. Text contained few or no errors.

 

Teacher comments

         

 

 

Rubric for group grade

Grading Category

Beginning

0-6

Developing

7-12

Accomplished

13-17

Exemplary

18-20

Score

Product: Group Dynamics

Group did not work together

Group alienated one or more members or did not effectively work together in a productive manner

Group worked well together to achieve their outcome. All members contributed.

Group worked well together to produce an outstanding analysis and recommendation. Each member contributed greatly.

 

Product: Analysis of documents

Group did not analyze documents

Group needs to work on analysis of appropriate documents

Group analyzed and determined which documents and websites were appropriate.

Group analyzed and selected informative and exemplary documents relevant to their subject.

 

Product: Design

No product was produced

Product was laid out in a confusing manner. Some material was inappropriate and irrelevant to the subject.

Product was laid out well with appropriate materials.

Product displays an exciting and interesting design with appropriate materials and images that contribute to understanding.

 

Product:

Organization

No presentation given

Presentation was haphazard and confusing. Little or no print materials or presentation aids used.

Presentation was moderately well planned. Reasonable conclusions offered. Adequate print materials or presentation aids used.

Presentation was planned in a logical manner. Explanations and reasons given for conclusions. Print materials or presentation aids useful for others interested in the topic.

 

Presentation: Delivery

No presentation was given

Presentation was not rehearsed. Presenters were confused and difficult to understand.

Presentation was rehearsed. Presenters shared tasks and were understandable.

Presentation was well rehearsed and coherent. Presenters shared tasks equally.

 

Teacher comments

         

 

 

 

Return to Menu

 

Conclusion

By completing this assignment, you have successfully researched the methods a president might use to gain information on foreign affairs. By taking on the role of a government official, you have learned how vital each advisor to the president is when asked to take on a task such as this one. Aside from generating a report, you have also become well versed in the status of eastern European nations since the fall of communism in 1989. Are these nations better off now than they were under communism? Who has benefited the most from the transition? Who has not? Which countries have most successfully navigated the changes, and why? Why is it that many people in the region think their lives were better under the communists? Is capitalism really better than communism? These are some of the many questions I hope you will approach in your research. Have fun!

 

Return to Menu