Spies Like Us: An in depth analysis of Eastern Europe
A Web Quest for 12th Grade (AP European History)
Designed by
Bethany Nottingham
browndog1530@yahoo.com

The Berlin Wall Comes Down: November 9, 1989
Introduction | Task | Resources | Process | Evaluation | Conclusion
The year is 2009, the twentieth anniversary of the fall of communism. You have just landed a high-ranking position in the United States government. The president has asked you along with other officials to conduct an in depth analysis of the political, economic, military, and social developments of the former communist nations in eastern Europe in order to determine where assistance, supervision or intervention may be needed.
As either director of NATO, the Secretary of State, the Undersecretary of State for Europe, Chief of the NSA, the DCI, or the Chairperson of the JCS, you will work together to develop this report for the president. She feels that as the leading world power, it is our responsibility to promote democratic ideals throughout the world. Therefore you must maintain a watchful eye on these former communist nations to assure her that democracy prevails.
Listed below are several websites that may be helpful in your task. You may also use any sites you find relevant to your search as well.
Sites containing historical background:
http://www.dailysoft.com/berlinwall/
http://www.andreas.com/berlin.html
http://www.historyguide.org/europe/lecture16.htmlGovernmental agency sites:
http://www.epa.gov/oia/dark.htm
http://www.nsa.gov/about_nsa/index.html
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/rls/dos/index.cfm?docid=436&clid=299Sites containing documents:
http://www.nara.gov/exhall/originals/kennedy.html
http://www.aynrand.org/medialink/berlin.shtml
http://www.seerecon.org/KeyDocuments/KD1999062401.htm
http://www.rferl.org/nca/special/10years/
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/newsid_501000/501580.asp
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/eu.htm
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/newsid_515000/515968.asp
http://library.thinkquest.org/10775/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/newsid_734000/734123.stm
http://www.franklincollege.edu/matweb/maharry/budapest/NPRreports.html
http://www.uga.edu/columns/990215/front2.htmlSites containing pictures:
http://www.dieberlinermauer.de/berlinwallhome/berlinwallhome.html
Other helpful links:
http://plato.acadiau.ca/COURSES/POLS/Grieve/3593/~3593.html
| US Department of State "regional desk" |
Press releases and policy statements on the "Newly Independent States" |
| Radio Free Europe (RFE/RL) |
Searchable index of daily press briefs |
| RFE/RL Special Report 10 years after |
Articles and interviews 10 yrs after fall of communism |
| RFE Weekly News Features |
Page long articles on current events |
| Washington Post Balkans Report |
. |
| Study on NATO enlargement |
The "official" line on costs and benefits |
| OSCE |
Organization for Security & Cooperation in Europe |
| Corruption: Johnston Colgate U Biblio |
Professional bibliography and index to web resources |
| Transparency International |
Tackling corruption through info and institution building |
| Centre for the Study of Democracy |
Bulgarian--promoting institution-building |
| Slavic Research Centre |
Comprehensive multilayered site based in Japan |
| Eurasia Foundation |
Democratic and free market institution building |
| Russian and East European Network Information Center |
U of Texas premier site: If you can't find it here, look harder! |
| Freedom House: Nations in Transit Reports |
PDF files from a respected source: articles & country reports for EVERY country in the region |
| Crisis Web |
Analysis of Bosnia & South Balkans |
| World Bank: Europe & Central Asia |
Mission, news releases, data |
| EBRD |
European Bank for Reconstruction & Development |
| Centre for Study of Public Policy |
Summaries of hundreds of articles on public opinion & democratization (Richard Rose, Director) |
| International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) |
News and judgments |
| Russian & Eastern European Studies (REES) |
A Pittsburg U guide |
| Amina |
A page criticising Russian actions in Chechnya |
| gallupphoto |
Interesting photo-journalism from Czech viewpoint |
| CentralEurope.com |
Daily news focused on the region |
| Russia.com |
Daily news on the faltering Russian state & economy |
| Eurasia Research Center |
News and analysis |
| Baltic States Weblinks |
. |
| Bosnia Home Page |
CalTech University |
| Open Society Archives |
Central European University on communism & cold war |
In order to successfully complete this WebQuest you will need to work as a group. It is up to you to decide what each member in the group will do. The group should consist of six members as stated above.
The following rubrics will be used to determine your final grade for this project. Please note that you will receive both an individual as well as a group grade for this WebQuest.
Rubric for Individual report
|
Grading Category |
Beginning 0-6 |
Developing 7-12 |
Accomplished 13-17 |
Exemplary 18-20 |
Score |
|
Product: Individual Research |
Little or no research was conducted |
Research skills need to be developed more |
Research was complete and accurate. All major aspects of the subject addressed |
Research on the subject is comprehensive and extensive |
|
|
Product: Assessment of web sites |
Little or no assessment was done |
Needs to better organize and differentiate importance of web sites |
Assessment is appropriate and information obtained is relevant to subject |
Assessment is organized, detailed and innovative in relation to the subject |
|
|
Product: Historical Accuracy |
Little or no attempt is made at determining historical accuracy |
Needs to check for errors in accuracy |
Information is accurate and complete. All major aspects of the subject addressed |
Information is accurate and precise. Subject is explained in detail |
|
|
Product: Mechanics |
No product produced or too many errors |
Writing was confusing or difficult to read. Text contained many errors in grammar and/or spelling. |
Writing was clear and interesting with a moderate amount of errors. |
Writing was easily understandable and exciting to read. Text contained few or no errors. |
|
|
Teacher comments |
Rubric for group grade
|
Grading Category |
Beginning 0-6 |
Developing 7-12 |
Accomplished 13-17 |
Exemplary 18-20 |
Score |
|
Product: Group Dynamics |
Group did not work together |
Group alienated one or more members or did not effectively work together in a productive manner |
Group worked well together to achieve their outcome. All members contributed. |
Group worked well together to produce an outstanding analysis and recommendation. Each member contributed greatly. |
|
|
Product: Analysis of documents |
Group did not analyze documents |
Group needs to work on analysis of appropriate documents |
Group analyzed and determined which documents and websites were appropriate. |
Group analyzed and selected informative and exemplary documents relevant to their subject. |
|
|
Product: Design |
No product was produced |
Product was laid out in a confusing manner. Some material was inappropriate and irrelevant to the subject. |
Product was laid out well with appropriate materials. |
Product displays an exciting and interesting design with appropriate materials and images that contribute to understanding. |
|
|
Product: Organization |
No presentation given |
Presentation was haphazard and confusing. Little or no print materials or presentation aids used. |
Presentation was moderately well planned. Reasonable conclusions offered. Adequate print materials or presentation aids used. |
Presentation was planned in a logical manner. Explanations and reasons given for conclusions. Print materials or presentation aids useful for others interested in the topic. |
|
|
Presentation: Delivery |
No presentation was given |
Presentation was not rehearsed. Presenters were confused and difficult to understand. |
Presentation was rehearsed. Presenters shared tasks and were understandable. |
Presentation was well rehearsed and coherent. Presenters shared tasks equally. |
|
|
Teacher comments |
Return to Menu
By completing this assignment, you have successfully researched the methods a president might use to gain information on foreign affairs. By taking on the role of a government official, you have learned how vital each advisor to the president is when asked to take on a task such as this one. Aside from generating a report, you have also become well versed in the status of eastern European nations since the fall of communism in 1989. Are these nations better off now than they were under communism? Who has benefited the most from the transition? Who has not? Which countries have most successfully navigated the changes, and why? Why is it that many people in the region think their lives were better under the communists? Is capitalism really better than communism? These are some of the many questions I hope you will approach in your research. Have fun!
Return to Menu